Seems to be in good way - this is an answer for another analyst
Blue line: percentage of Day to Day increment of new confirmed cases, excl. recovered and deaths in same day
Green line: calculated Average for previous 7 days = comparison of the real and ongoing trend data
same is readable from another perspective (chart below):
- there is still valid Pareto principle, that only 4 from 20 IT regions make impact to the heavy numbers (76% of active infected)
- there is living 40% of total IT population
- Lombardy (46% of the active infected and 42% of the mentioned 4-regions population) is on decrease of the Day to Day infected = then you can see the decreasing effect in the chart above
Last chart (below):
- 4 mentioned IT regions excluded, then we see data for rest of 16 IT regions only
- just 6 311 active infected vs 26 062 in Total (to be sure 12 095 of total in Lombardia)
- just 581 people in hospital intensive care vs 2 060 in Total (879 of total in Lombardia) = 3 people per 1000 sqkm (32x32km to be sure)
- just 3 030 people in standard hospital care vs 14 954 in Total (7 832 of total in Lombardia) = 15 people per 1000 sqkm ... of course with such disease mode of hospital operation
Pls, don't take it as kind of impertinent description, mostly when you read about people in hospital (mentioned as "only"). Every such infected person is bad news. But we need to read clear data, when we like make a consideration or data modeling. I have seen many of them, include Angela Merkel prediction about 70% infected population in Germany. WTF. As you can see, there is still math about 0,05% of total Italy population. And more important, that 46% of the infected people we can count in single region. And there is obviously decreasing trend in last 17 days.
Lombardy approach to handle this virus story must be for us as kind of negative example.