Coronavirus impact

Currently reading
Coronavirus impact

E7A79D10-29AA-4260-8744-D92BCF74DA3F.jpeg
 
perfect, thx for such post
it’s a confirmation why some part (provinces) of heavy affected regions in Italy have different spread index [infected/population density] what is also under my analyze now. When:
Bergamo is about 3416(infected)/400(sqkm2)= 8,54 active infected per sqkm till now .... COVID-19 center
Brescia
and nearby province with major city:
Milan is about 1750(infected)/2000(sqkm2)= only 0,875 till now

There is still one generic point - combination of Extensive distancing and forced (country, regions, cities) quarantine can slow down the trend.
Otherwise your countries will boost infected people every new day.

...and here is an explanation, how “red zone” quarantine never works (part of article from dw.com and date: Feb 24th 2020):
Authorities have decreed that nobody may enter or leave the "red zone." To enforce the quarantine, two uniformed Carabinieri — Italy's national police — have taken up position on the village road. But despite the blockade, they are letting farmers on tractors, cyclists and locals bound for the supermarket or pharmacy in the adjacent "red zone" pass and return. Enzo, another Vittadone local, says the officers will let anyone pass who can provide a good reason. He's been in the "red zone" to do his shopping before, and thinks it's not right to keep locals on lockdown like this. In his opinion, measures taken by local authorities and Italy's national government are too drastic.
 
Well, Corona has turned into a Global full blown panic fest now.
i work for a major utility here in Australia, we all got sent home today to WFH for the next few weeks, no food, toilet paper or hand wash products left on the shelves, peeps gone crazy!
 
Seems to be in good way - this is an answer for another analyst
Blue line: percentage of Day to Day increment of new confirmed cases, excl. recovered and deaths in same day
Green line: calculated Average for previous 7 days = comparison of the real and ongoing trend data

1584539234960.png


same is readable from another perspective (chart below):
- there is still valid Pareto principle, that only 4 from 20 IT regions make impact to the heavy numbers (76% of active infected)
- there is living 40% of total IT population
- Lombardy (46% of the active infected and 42% of the mentioned 4-regions population) is on decrease of the Day to Day infected = then you can see the decreasing effect in the chart above

1584539697263.png


Last chart (below):
- 4 mentioned IT regions excluded, then we see data for rest of 16 IT regions only
- just 6 311 active infected vs 26 062 in Total (to be sure 12 095 of total in Lombardia)
- just 581 people in hospital intensive care vs 2 060 in Total (879 of total in Lombardia) = 3 people per 1000 sqkm (32x32km to be sure)
- just 3 030 people in standard hospital care vs 14 954 in Total (7 832 of total in Lombardia) = 15 people per 1000 sqkm ... of course with such disease mode of hospital operation

1584540730137.png


Pls, don't take it as kind of impertinent description, mostly when you read about people in hospital (mentioned as "only"). Every such infected person is bad news. But we need to read clear data, when we like make a consideration or data modeling. I have seen many of them, include Angela Merkel prediction about 70% infected population in Germany. WTF. As you can see, there is still math about 0,05% of total Italy population. And more important, that 46% of the infected people we can count in single region. And there is obviously decreasing trend in last 17 days.
Lombardy approach to handle this virus story must be for us as kind of negative example.
 
Ok, what the hell? I thought my boss was insane with stats but this is a whole new level. Where do you get the time and will to do this? Personally I really don't care about this whole situation. We follow rules, stick to what was suggested and that's it. I have to say that my life day to day operation has been 0 affected by this situation, and I mean 0.
 
for such data model you need just one tool (MS PowerBI) and data pump to public sources (100% in CSV for Corona), then everything is automated. If there is no CSV or xxx- data source connectors, you can use parserhub (or similar) for data parsing from web sources (if there is a consistent structure), also automated process.

"Welcome my son, welcome to the machine. Where have you been?" :cool:
 
No, no. You misunderstood me. I asked time and will, not tools. I know this is PBI, the whole forum stinks of that M$ platform, I was just curious about will and time. Still kudos man, keep crunching those number ;)
someone spend a time with hockey, someone with bike, someone with books
and I have such kind of deviation, to understand what happens. Little bit as my favorite Hans Rosling in his creative data interpretation. Fact-fullness driven
 

And about the guy that runs that tracking website:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Similar threads

It will be a long shot. To answer @Fortran consideration, it is necessary to describe the issue in more...
Replies
12
Views
3,417
SOSHO & SMB vendors: ASUSTOR, AC&NC, Buffalo, D-link, Drobo, HP, LaCie, Netgear, QNAP Systems, Synology...
Replies
0
Views
1,054

Welcome to SynoForum.com!

SynoForum.com is an unofficial Synology forum for NAS owners and enthusiasts.

Registration is free, easy and fast!

Trending threads

Back
Top