I am new here and would be interested to hear if anyone else is using Synology in industrial environments.
I inherited my first Synology about 7 years ago – DSM 4-ish. It was clunky by today’s standards, but a lot better than my existing experiences with almost everything else. We started using them for backups, and I bought an 1812+ for home use to experiment with.
Fast-forward to today, and I feel like I am some sort of Synology evangelist. We support a lot of remote oil-and gas sites. In the past these sites would have had hundreds of thousands of dollars in servers, SAN’s, remote-access infrastructure, NVR’s, etc.
We still have routers (“security appliances” now) of course. Large server stacks are now replaced with dual-node Hyper-converged systems. Almost everything else…. Replaced with Synology.
At first I thought I was crazy – and so did everyone else.
“We are putting in this box. It will handle the backups. It will sync the backups off-site. It will handle your security cameras. This box will run a bunch of Docker containers that will handle some tricks we need for SSL-proxy access to RDP sessions. One of these Docker containers will also collect health data on your plant network and serve it up to our central Grafana dashboards. It will also be a log-aggregator. Also, this box – I swear to god – if we experience a total server failure, we will literally act as a hypervisor and boot up the latest backup of the HMI server and RUN YOUR WHOLE FREAKING PLANT until we can get someone up there for repairs (we have done it). “
“Also – this box – costs a few thousand dollars. Cheaper than 1 month of the support contract you had on your old gear.”
I thought I was crazy, but now we have nearly a hundred deployed – including almost every model imaginable. Sure – we have had a few fail – their failure rate has not been any worse than the enterprise gear we used to buy. And it is cheap enough that we can ridiculously over-spare.
If you have a gas-plant in the middle of nowhere that is down, and I have a Synology there – I will be able to get it running somehow.
So – I have seen the track record. Have I just been lucky? Am I actually crazy? Or are these things the swiss-army knife of the IT world?
Has anyone else been this brave/stupid with these types of deployments?
Curious – and interested in hearing about other experiences.
My wish-list:
- They should have continued advancing the EDS14 track. A din-rail mountable DC-powered version would be a game-changer.
- Rugged fanless enclosures. At one time there was a company making these for Synology. Can't find them anymore.
I inherited my first Synology about 7 years ago – DSM 4-ish. It was clunky by today’s standards, but a lot better than my existing experiences with almost everything else. We started using them for backups, and I bought an 1812+ for home use to experiment with.
Fast-forward to today, and I feel like I am some sort of Synology evangelist. We support a lot of remote oil-and gas sites. In the past these sites would have had hundreds of thousands of dollars in servers, SAN’s, remote-access infrastructure, NVR’s, etc.
We still have routers (“security appliances” now) of course. Large server stacks are now replaced with dual-node Hyper-converged systems. Almost everything else…. Replaced with Synology.
At first I thought I was crazy – and so did everyone else.
“We are putting in this box. It will handle the backups. It will sync the backups off-site. It will handle your security cameras. This box will run a bunch of Docker containers that will handle some tricks we need for SSL-proxy access to RDP sessions. One of these Docker containers will also collect health data on your plant network and serve it up to our central Grafana dashboards. It will also be a log-aggregator. Also, this box – I swear to god – if we experience a total server failure, we will literally act as a hypervisor and boot up the latest backup of the HMI server and RUN YOUR WHOLE FREAKING PLANT until we can get someone up there for repairs (we have done it). “
“Also – this box – costs a few thousand dollars. Cheaper than 1 month of the support contract you had on your old gear.”
I thought I was crazy, but now we have nearly a hundred deployed – including almost every model imaginable. Sure – we have had a few fail – their failure rate has not been any worse than the enterprise gear we used to buy. And it is cheap enough that we can ridiculously over-spare.
If you have a gas-plant in the middle of nowhere that is down, and I have a Synology there – I will be able to get it running somehow.
So – I have seen the track record. Have I just been lucky? Am I actually crazy? Or are these things the swiss-army knife of the IT world?
Has anyone else been this brave/stupid with these types of deployments?
Curious – and interested in hearing about other experiences.
My wish-list:
- They should have continued advancing the EDS14 track. A din-rail mountable DC-powered version would be a game-changer.
- Rugged fanless enclosures. At one time there was a company making these for Synology. Can't find them anymore.