Hi,
Background; I currently pay for a CrashPlan subscription, but for the need I have (to mainly protect my photos and some personal documents that is not that extensive in volume) I think this is a bit overkill.
I'm thinking of moving all my documents, photos and videos to googles cloud service (i pay for some extra space anyway) but photos and videos still are reduced quality. This will make them available from any place and saved in the case my house gets struck by lightning. - In that case I can live with the limited quality of the pics, and no version history of documents.
I tried to read about the possibilities, and it seem like synology has the best product for my needs and budget; I don't know if the below would be feasible.
For not loosing (erasing) files accidentally or loose files by ransomware, I'd like to set up a local NAS that my PC(s) backs up to, and if possible, to protect that unit from failure (dropped or similar) have it to backup to a secondary place within the house.
I'd also like, if possible, the unit so serve as a media/file server with plex DLNA support for streaming to phones, chromecast, android- and samsung TVs. 4k is not necessary, at least not for transcoding.
I would like, if possible, for the documents part, to have versioning.
I don't need (as I can see now) to access the drive from outside my LAN, I have a windows machine always on I remote to when needed.
My budget I think could stretch to a DS220+ and start with one drive, but I will not afford yet another synology for backup of the backup so to say. If possible start with one drive, expandable to RAID for extra protection (or run smaller/cheaper drives to start with and step up to larger NAS spec driver later on). Then to let the NAS back the part where photos and docs are stored to a small celeron powered linux NUC with USB HDD within the same LAN.
One alternative is of course to build a linux server from scratch, but I feel I don't have the time and knowledge to do this, and want something that works pretty much out of the box. If I can reuse the small linux nuc I already have for other tasks to serve as a second backup, that would bring down the cost. Does the synology software cost anything? It's only my personal data that needs to be "double secured" so to say (or triple as I plan to have it also on google drive) - they are pretty limited in size - I don't store a lot of videos.
Is my thoughts somewhat in line with what a DS220+ provides?
Background; I currently pay for a CrashPlan subscription, but for the need I have (to mainly protect my photos and some personal documents that is not that extensive in volume) I think this is a bit overkill.
I'm thinking of moving all my documents, photos and videos to googles cloud service (i pay for some extra space anyway) but photos and videos still are reduced quality. This will make them available from any place and saved in the case my house gets struck by lightning. - In that case I can live with the limited quality of the pics, and no version history of documents.
I tried to read about the possibilities, and it seem like synology has the best product for my needs and budget; I don't know if the below would be feasible.
For not loosing (erasing) files accidentally or loose files by ransomware, I'd like to set up a local NAS that my PC(s) backs up to, and if possible, to protect that unit from failure (dropped or similar) have it to backup to a secondary place within the house.
I'd also like, if possible, the unit so serve as a media/file server with plex DLNA support for streaming to phones, chromecast, android- and samsung TVs. 4k is not necessary, at least not for transcoding.
I would like, if possible, for the documents part, to have versioning.
I don't need (as I can see now) to access the drive from outside my LAN, I have a windows machine always on I remote to when needed.
My budget I think could stretch to a DS220+ and start with one drive, but I will not afford yet another synology for backup of the backup so to say. If possible start with one drive, expandable to RAID for extra protection (or run smaller/cheaper drives to start with and step up to larger NAS spec driver later on). Then to let the NAS back the part where photos and docs are stored to a small celeron powered linux NUC with USB HDD within the same LAN.
One alternative is of course to build a linux server from scratch, but I feel I don't have the time and knowledge to do this, and want something that works pretty much out of the box. If I can reuse the small linux nuc I already have for other tasks to serve as a second backup, that would bring down the cost. Does the synology software cost anything? It's only my personal data that needs to be "double secured" so to say (or triple as I plan to have it also on google drive) - they are pretty limited in size - I don't store a lot of videos.
Is my thoughts somewhat in line with what a DS220+ provides?