So that sounds like the old switch’s backplane was getting overloaded. If you got a TP-Link 8 x 1GbE switch for $25 then that was probably the unmanaged 1008, or similar, and I think they have 16 Gbps backplane.
Coming new to this thread and looking at what’s been said, thinking about how I’ve played with my LAN topology, I would say that the approach of using LAG (the adaptive load balance or equivalent one when vSwitch is enabled) would give the simplest setup. Do this on the NAS and attach its two LAN ports and all other wired devices to a big enough switch. Then a single 1 GbE to the router.
The adaptive load balance is available on the
DS920+ (as it is on my
DS1520+) and while not as granular for sharing the two lines, you have six devices and the more devices the more even the sharing and more like to dynamic LAG versions.
I see the router probably supports LAG on its LAN ports.
But note that the types of LAG it supports will required a more expensive managed switch. That means in the original post the diagram had a switch LAG’ed to the router, but you had an unmanaged switch… so this would not work. Even though the NAS doing LAG to the router would work.
If you got a managed switch supporting the right LACP LAG for the router then you could have more total bandwidth for your AX wireless client to access the NAS. Some switches allow you to set the criteria for sharing LAG capacity: probably use source IP + destination IP.
Since SMB multi-channel doesn’t work when you’re already using LAG then you have to choose which is more important: SMB file sharing or supporting multiple devices with other services. It sounds like LAG is more helpful in your situation. Plus SMB MC with Mac is somewhat problematic…
My setup with DS1520+ which has four 1GbE LAN ports is to LAG three of them and leave the fourth standalone. My Mac Mini has a 10GbE port (planning for future use) and a thunderbolt adapter with 1GbE. I do get SMB MC working but it fluctuates between 130 and 180 MBps (if memory serves). The NAS uses the LAG Bond1 as the main interface and this is what all other clients use to access it. I do note from reading others experiences with Mac and SMB MC then mine working, such as it is, might be not be the same as other people.
The future would be to upgrade to 10 GbE devices so that there’s no more messing with LAG etc. But that requires quite a bit of negotiating
Without LAG, the NAS will can have two IPs on the LAN… just directly access the NAS on LAN1 IP for some services and LAN2 IP for others.