NAS Compares Thunderbolt 3 vs 40Gbe NAS in 2019

Thunderbolt 3 vs 40Gbe – Which Should You Buy?

Questions about choosing between 10GbE and 40Gbe are becoming increasingly popular. People want to understand what does 40Gbe mean and why is it so important. The Most popular connection for people who need the fastest data transfer speeds a priority, currently is Thunderbolt. As you are no doubt aware, Thunderbolt 3 theoretical is speed is around 40Gb/s. When working on video editing projects of 4K and even 8K media, file sizes grow enormously. With bigger files, it takes much longer to transfer them between computer and storage devices for editing, distribution, or to simply backup. You may think “I have Thunderbolt 3, why would I consider another connection which has the same speed?”. Let me take a moment or two of your time to explain the advantages and disadvantages of 40Gbe Networks and Thunderbolt 3 NAS/DAS for your storage needs.

Continue reading...
- - -

Check out FREE NAS advice section on nascompares.com
 
now lets back to math:
- swap disk for video editing sw is more important
- there is RAID0 best alternative, because fast possible speed driven solution, encapsulated into LUN and iSCSI connection (or TB connection when available)
- when you use 450MB/s writing speed x 8 bay NAS, then you have theoretically boosted 3600 MB/sec = 28 800 Mbps. Not enough for 40TB.
- then if we need utilize 40Gbps TB to maximum we need min. RAID0 with 12x 450MB/s, but to be honest we need also power from CPU in such NAS (or DAS), because there is no special HW RAID card.

So, what about RAID0 with 4x M.2 NMVe disks with theoretically writing 1200MB/s deep queue large blocks speed, still in 96% utilization of the 40TB speed. What NAS has support for such 4x M.2 NMVe disks?

Follow this article, there is a solution - QNAP TVS872XT. But:
- article author recommendation is based on theoretical speed of the M.2 NMVe disk 2000-3000MB/s
- where real speed of such disks is under 1500MB/s (block size, CPU, RAID, ...), you can see in disk compares sites (don’t forget, random speed test is theory, real block test is practice).
- then for the 40Gbps utilization he needs min. 4 disks into RAID0, but the recommended device has just two slots.

What pretty nice example of immature calculation. Or recommendation driven by fee?
Then if you try build your own postproduction studio, don’t hesitate use calculator and simple math.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Similar threads

  • Article
Good overview. There is no obvious replacement. The lack of SHR-like system by QNAP makes it DOA. Which...
Replies
1
Views
597
  • Article
EVERYTHING We Know About Synology NAS Hardware and Software for 2024-2025 Synology has always been the...
Replies
0
Views
4,597
  • Article
When looking at Synology NAS security, most people are generally looking to harden the NAS itself. While...
Replies
0
Views
604
  • Article
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ugb5TrFOjA Source: WunderTech (YouTube channel) Discuss by replying to...
Replies
0
Views
536
  • Article
A History Lesson on NAS Security Incidents – STAY SAFE! As someone who has long relied on Network...
Replies
0
Views
477
  • Article
Brilliant. I moved Plex onto an M.2 drive on my DS918+ using the Github script hack, and it's way more...
Replies
1
Views
606
  • Article
The one that works, gets security Updates, and is paid for? 😁
Replies
1
Views
982

Welcome to SynoForum.com!

SynoForum.com is an unofficial Synology forum for NAS owners and enthusiasts.

Registration is free, easy and fast!

Trending threads

Back
Top